台灣文學研究

2014年11月30日星期日

注目：重探一九八○年代香港文學

學術動態報導

Report

注目：重探一九八○年代香港文學

Bring Back to Focus:

Re-exploring Hong Kong Literature in the 1980s

陳筱筠

Chen, Siao-Yun

摘要

一九八○年代香港確定將於1997年回歸中國，這個歷史事件讓各地關注起香港，有關香港的政治前景、經濟發展、文化論述與文學想像等各層面的討論，在當時形成一股香港研究的熱潮。如果我們先僅以香港文學作為討論範疇，1980年～1997年是一段曾經被大量注目的階段，在後九七以後雖然仍有陸續的討論，以及許多重要學者們的持續努力耕耘，但香港文學的研究或討論在後九七之後的確有慢慢消減的趨勢。香港回歸至今17年時間，台港兩地的交流或社會發展在近年因為中國因素也產生多許可供參照的地方，現階段的我們，如果重新注目香港文學，一方面也許能避免當時在香港研究熱潮下，經常會把香港擺放在中英夾縫位置的單一想像，另方面也可擴大台灣文學與香港文學的討論範疇。

關鍵詞：一九八○年代、香港文學、香港研究熱潮

Abstract

In the 1980s it had been confirmed that the handover would take place in 1997. This historic issue brought Hong Kong to the focus of the whole world. There was a lot of discussion on Hong Kong about its political outlook, economic development, cultural discourse, and literary imagination, which facilitated the rise of Hong Kong studies. If narrowing down our discussion realm to Hong Kong literature, we can find that during the period of 1980s and 1990s, Hong Kong literature had become the central issue. After 1997, some relative discussion and discourse about Hong Kong literature continued and the devotion of scholars was as significant. Nevertheless, the studies of Hong Kong literature has the tendency to decline. Now 17 years have passed since the handover, it is necessary to re-explore Hong Kong in this phase since the factor of China has become a common subject that Taiwan and Hong Kong both have to face. It will help us to find a new frame to explore Hong Kong literature and enlarge the range of discussion of Taiwanese literature and Hong Kong literature.

Keywords: 1980s, Hong Kong Literature, the Rise of Hong Kong Studies

檢視全文

從香港《大公報‧文藝》（1938-1941）編輯策略的本地面向檢討南來文人在香港的「實績」說

研究論文

Research Article

從香港《大公報‧文藝》（1938-1941）編輯策略的本地面向檢討南來文人在香港的「實績」說

On the ‘Actual Contributions’ of the Mainland Literati: AStudy Based on the Editorial Strategies of Hong Kong Ta KungPao ’s Literary Supplement (1938-1941)

樊善標

Fan, Sin Piu

摘要

上海在一九三○年代是中國報業的重要基地，但自1937年底為日軍攻陷之後，報館紛紛停刊或向後方遷移。移至香港的上海報刊中，《大公報》為犖犖大者。香港《大公報》背負在中國大陸創辦三十多年來的名聲，其「文藝」副刊兩任編者蕭乾、楊剛也都是通稱的南來文人，皆努力以文藝支持抗戰，直至1941年底香港也為日軍所佔領，港版《大公報》停刊為止。後來的論者或主張這一時期的南來文人「以傳播新思想、新文化、新文學，宣傳抗日等實績性行為」，「掀起香港文學史上第一次文學創作高潮」。

本文從香港《大公報‧文藝》的具體內容探討兩任編者編輯策略的本地面向，從而展示蕭乾、楊剛所代表的南來文人對香港本地的態度，反思他們的「實績」與香港文學的關係。本文認為前述論者以民族主義建構南來文人和第一代香港本地作者的傳承，並不符合史實。這種說法既未能切合當時多數香港居民的心態，同時也忽略了南來文人間的差異。如能承認文學評價不僅僅建基於民族意識，香港文學史或將展現另一種更有意思的面貌。

關鍵詞：《大公報》、「文藝」版、南來文人、香港文學史

Abstract

The Hong Kong Ta Kung Pao (1938-1941) inherited the anti-Japanese stand from its Shanghai counterpart. The editors of the newspaper’s Literary Supplement Xiao Qian (蕭乾) and Yang Gang (楊剛) were mainlanders who supported the anti-Japanese war through literary works. It was generally thought that the literati from the mainland of this period spread new ideas, new cultures, new-vernacular literature and anti-Japanese sentiments, as a result their actual contributions brought the first climax of the Hong Kong literature.

This paper discusses the local perspectives of Xiao and Yang with reference to the newspaper’s literary supplements. The ‘actual contributions’ of Xiao and Yang to Hong Kong literature are carefully reassessed.

This paper also argues that nationalism may not be the most important factor which influenced the first generation of local (Hong Kong) writers, and that the mainland literati are not single-minded. National consciousness should not be the only assessment criterion when we reconstruct history of Hong Kong literature.

Keywords: Ta Kung Pao, literary supplement, the mainland literati, literary history of Hong Kong

檢視全文

知性的對決／孤絕的存在：一九五、六○年代白萩的詩論、詩作對「現代詩」寫作的擴展與延伸

研究論文

Research Article

知性的對決／孤絕的存在：

一九五、六○年代白萩的詩論、詩作對「現代詩」寫作的擴展與延伸

Intellectual Reflection/Lonely Existence: Influences of Bai Ciou’s Poetics and Poetry in 1950s’ and 1960s’ on Enriching and Extending Modern Poetry

阮美慧

Juan, Mei-Hui

摘要

白萩（1937―）十八歲時即展露了文學的才華，1955年以〈羅盤〉一詩，獲得「中國新詩協會」第一屆詩人獎的殊榮，當時被詩壇喻為「天才詩人」，備受詩壇矚目。因此，當時其詩論、詩作，對知性的對決、孤絕的存在等「現代」質素的大力著墨，都對「現代詩」的寫作，具有一定的啟發。

其中，白萩雖強調「實驗」、「創新」的重要，但卻先在「傳統」與「個人」之間，重新思考彼此的關係，認為詩人並非屈就於傳統之下，而是要從「傳統」中跨越，並能夠超越傳統，這才是他對「現代」意涵的解讀。此外，他也特別提出詩的知性，分析情緒與情感的差異，同時，亦強調構思嚴密的結構、組織，才能使作品具有完整性及永恆性。在詩作技巧上，特別對詩的空間（繪畫性）及時間（音樂性）的設計，建立起詩中物我合一的原始性關係，使詩在意象、節奏、旋律上別出心裁，然而，這些新穎的方法，仍是為了展現詩的深刻意義，特別在一九五、六○年代，詩人對人生實存境況的探究，顯現人在現實中的孤獨感。而白萩的詩作，在語言精準的操控下，其「現代」精神的呈現，成為一種「異端的誘惑」，而為當時「現代詩」提供了新路徑。由此觀之，白萩做為一位真正的詩人，總是能夠走在時代的前端。

關鍵字：白萩、現代詩、知性的對決、孤絕的存在、詩的原始性關係

Abstract

Bai Ciou (白萩, 1937-) shows his literary talent at the age of 18. In 1955, he won the 1. Poetry Award from “Chinese Poetry Association” (中國新詩協會) for his work “compass” (羅盤). He is then hailed as a “poet of genius”, attracting much attention from his colleagues. Owing to this, his poetics and poetry, emphasizing the modern essences of lonely existence and intellectual reflection, has certain inspiration for the writing of modern poetry.

Bai Ciou (白萩) emphasizes the importance of experiment and innovation. He re-thinks the relationship between tradition and individuals, and suggests that poets cannot be subordinated to tradition, but has to go through and transcend it. This is indeed his interpretation of modernity. Besides, he puts forward the intellectuality of poetry, analyzing the difference between emotion and feeling and emphasizing the strict structure and organization of ideas. Those are the elements which keep the poetry in its integrality and eternality. Technically, he focuses on the arrangement of space (pictorial) and time (musical) of poetry, building the original relationship between poetry and things, which makes the poetry innovative in its images, rhymes and melodies. These novel approaches are introduced for showing the deep meaning of poetry, the real situation of existence and the loneliness in the reality in 1950s’ and 1960s’. Bai Ciou’s (白萩) poetry, being written in accurate language, is a kind of “seduction of heresy” and offers a new approach for modern poetry. Bai Ciou (白萩), as a real poet, is always at the forefront of the times.

Keywords: Bai Ciou (白萩), modern poetry, intellectual reflection, lonely existence, original relationship of poetry

檢視全文

日治初期警察官眼中的台灣原住民形象 ――以〈生蕃探險記〉為例

研究論文

Research Article

日治初期警察官眼中的台灣原住民形象

――以〈生蕃探險記〉為例

“SEIBANTANKENKI”: How Taiwanese Aborigines Were Perceived

by Japanese Police Officer in the Early Colonial Period

簡中昊

Chien, Chung Hao

摘要

連載於雜誌《太陽》的〈生蕃探險記〉，可說是日治時代中最早以台灣原住民為題材的記述之一。日治初期，關於原住民的第一手資料，大多出自於位居山地行政第一線的日本警察官之手。然而警察官的「原住民記述」，多是以進行統治為前提的行政或法律文書，鮮少有以讀者大眾為目標的作品。本稿將以日治初期的山地警察官所寫的〈生蕃探險記〉為例，藉由探究探險記的生產背景與經過，以及探險記中呈現的觀點，一探日治初期對於台灣原住民的認識。

關鍵字：日治初期、台灣原住民、生蕃、太陽、探險

Abstract

“SEIBANTANKENKI” (A Description of Taiwanese Savages) were published in the magazine Taiyao (The Sun) as a series of short stories. They were some of the early documents focusing on Taiwanese aborigines in the Japanese colonial period. In the early years of the Japanese colonial governance, most of the first-handed “Works of Taiwanese Aborigines” were written by Japanese police officers residing in the mountains. Most of the police officers’ writings were administrative or legal paper

works based on the needs of governance; few of them were written for the general public. This paper will use “SEIBANTANKENKI”, which was written by a police officer in the early Japanese colonial period, as an example to explore the process and background of the writing, in order to understand how people perceive Taiwanese aborigines around that time.

Keywords: Japanese colonial period, Taiwanese aborigines, barbarian, Taiyao (The Sun) , exploration

檢視全文

文學鬥爭、文學武器論、文藝大眾化——論賴明弘的普羅文論及其理論內在衝突

研究論文

Research Article

文學鬥爭、文學武器論、文藝大眾化

——論賴明弘的普羅文論及其理論內在衝突

Literary Struggle, Literary Weapon Theory, Literary Popularity:

On the Protarian Literature Theory of Ming-Hong Lai and its Inherent Conflicts

賴松輝

Lai, Song-Hui

摘要

本文探討一九三○年代「鄉土文學」論戰期間，賴明弘與《南音》作者群有關文學的階級性、民族性的論戰。討論著重於三個問題：首先，從當代的台灣文學場域，探討雙方的配置位置、文學體制，擁有的文學資本，而位居文壇前輩及掌握刊物編輯權的《南音》，擁有的文學資源、權力遠勝於賴明弘。其次，賴明弘運用文學鬥爭批評，將文藝當作階級「武器」，批判《南音》、《台灣新民報》、新舊文學及第三文學為布爾文學；第三，從文學理論的合理性來看，賴明弘批判各文學文類時，在文藝武器論與文藝大眾化、中國白話文等理論之間，往往呈現自相矛盾。他從階級意識批判新文學是布爾文學，卻又從中國白話文肯定，顯現理論標準不一；最後，由於缺乏理論深化，對於葉榮鐘「第三文學」的民族性挑戰，幾乎毫無理論的反擊。

關鍵字：賴明弘、文學鬥爭、文學武器論、文藝大眾化、鄉土文學論戰

Abstract

The paper exams a debate of Folklore Literature during the 1930s, Ming-Hong Lai embarked a discussion on class and nationality with Southern Voice . Therefore, my research will focus on three themes. Firstly, I will draw difference among the power relationship, the literary system and the culture capital between Ming-Hong Lai and Southern Voice . Secondly, how Ming-Hong Lai launched a series of literary infighting to criticize other literary communities such as Southern Voice, Taiwan New Daily Newspaper, Modern Literature and the Third Literature as a Bourgeois Literature. Thirdly, I will focus on the limitation of Lai’s contradiction in terms of the reasonability of literary theory and the consistency of ideology. Meanwhile, Lai made no sense to attack his counterpart’s literature theory and failed to persuade us with his arguments.

Keywords: Ming-Hong Lai, literary struggle, literary weapon theory, literary popularity, folklore literature debate

檢視全文